i5-12500TE vs Phenom II X4 X920 BE
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-12500TE outperforms Phenom II X4 X920 BE by a whopping 527% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i5-12500TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2179 | 840 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | 4x AMD Phenom II | no data |
Power efficiency | 3.07 | 24.74 |
Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
Release date | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) | January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i5-12500TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 12 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 18 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | no data | 163 mm2 |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i5-12500TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | S1 | 1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i5-12500TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | HyperTransport 3.0, Enhanced Virus Protection, AMD64, SSE4A, unlocked multiplier | no data |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i5-12500TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i5-12500TE are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i5-12500TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i5-12500TE.
PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.46 | 9.15 |
Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
Threads | 4 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
i5-12500TE has a 526.7% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.
The Core i5-12500TE is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 X920 BE in performance tests.
Be aware that Phenom II X4 X920 BE is a notebook processor while Core i5-12500TE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i5-12500TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.