AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE vs Intel Core i3-10110U
Comparing Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i3-10110U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i3-10110U quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i3-10110U performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
256K (per core)
Manufacturing process technology
Maximum core temperature
Maximum case temperature (TCase)
64 bit support
Information on Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i3-10110U compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Max number of CPUs in a configuration
Power consumption (TDP)
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i3-10110U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i3-10110U technologies aimed at raising security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i3-10110U are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i3-10110U.
Supported memory types
General parameters of GPUs integrated into Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i3-10110U.
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1000 MHz)
Let's see how good Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i3-10110U are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE
AMD64 (AMD CPUs 64-bit architecture. Almost identical to Intel 64, save for some little and rarely used nuances)
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10110U
1.5% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (1 September 2019 vs 12 May 2010)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 45 nm)
Less power hungry (25 vs 45 watts)
HyperThreading (allows one physical CPU function as two logical ones. It increases performance, since while one logical CPU is waiting for data, the second may still do useful work)
AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions - a set of SIMD instructions working with 128- and 256-bit registers)
AVX2 (Advanced Vector Extensions 2 - an extension to AVX, the set of SIMD instructions working with 128- and 256-bit registers)
Quick Sync (hardware acceleration of video encoding and decoding for Intel CPUs. Speeds up video encoding by times, but at the cost of somewhat lower quality)
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)
AES-NI (Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions - additional instructions for hardware acceleration of AES encryption and decryption)
MMX (MultiMedia Extensions - the very first (1996) SIMD instruction expansion for Intel desktop CPUs, works with 64-bit registers)
Intel 64 (64-bit Intel CPU architecture. Almost identical to AMD64, except small and rarely used nuances)
TXT (Trusted Execution Technology - protects the system against viruses and rootkits residing in BIOS or in a boot sector)
So, Phenom II X4 X920 BE or Core i3-10110U?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Intel Core i3-10110U. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Core i3-10110U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.