Ryzen 3 2300U vs Phenom II X4 N970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 N970
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.93
Ryzen 3 2300U
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.10
+233%

Ryzen 3 2300U outperforms Phenom II X4 N970 by a whopping 233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27361803
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series4x AMD Phenom IIAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiencyno data22.21
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
Release date16 December 2010 (14 years ago)8 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 N970 and Ryzen 3 2300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache512 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data210 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 N970 and Ryzen 3 2300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketS1FP5
Power consumption (TDP)2 MB15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and Ryzen 3 2300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and Ryzen 3 2300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and Ryzen 3 2300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and Ryzen 3 2300U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Phenom II X4 N970 0.93
Ryzen 3 2300U 3.10
+233%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Phenom II X4 N970 1647
Ryzen 3 2300U 5484
+233%
Samples: 121

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom II X4 N970 263
Ryzen 3 2300U 952
+262%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom II X4 N970 934
Ryzen 3 2300U 2768
+196%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Phenom II X4 N970 3
Ryzen 3 2300U 4
+78.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 3.10
Recency 16 December 2010 8 January 2018
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 15 Watt

Phenom II X4 N970 has 650% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 2300U, on the other hand, has a 233.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen 3 2300U is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Phenom II X4 N970 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 N970
Phenom II X4 N970
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
Ryzen 3 2300U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 90 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 N970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 203 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Phenom II X4 N970 and Ryzen 3 2300U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.