PRO A12-9800 vs Phenom II X4 N970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 N970
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.93

PRO A12-9800 outperforms Phenom II X4 N970 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27132042
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series4x AMD Phenom IIno data
Power efficiency1.131.39
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date16 December 2010 (14 years ago)3 October 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 N970 and PRO A12-9800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB2048 KB
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 N970 and PRO A12-9800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and PRO A12-9800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and PRO A12-9800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and PRO A12-9800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2400
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X4 N970 and PRO A12-9800 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and PRO A12-9800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and PRO A12-9800.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Phenom II X4 N970 0.93
PRO A12-9800 2.12
+128%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Phenom II X4 N970 1647
PRO A12-9800 3751
+128%
Samples: 35

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 2.12
Recency 16 December 2010 3 October 2016
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Phenom II X4 N970 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

PRO A12-9800, on the other hand, has a 128% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD PRO A12-9800 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Phenom II X4 N970 in performance tests.

Be aware that Phenom II X4 N970 is a notebook processor while PRO A12-9800 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 N970
Phenom II X4 N970
AMD PRO A12-9800
PRO A12-9800

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 88 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 N970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 15 votes

Rate PRO A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Phenom II X4 N970 and PRO A12-9800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.