Celeron M 330 vs Phenom II X4 N970
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2713 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 4x AMD Phenom II | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 1.13 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Banias (2003) |
| Release date | 16 December 2010 (14 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 N970 and Celeron M 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 512 KB L2 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.356V |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 N970 and Celeron M 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 24.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and Celeron M 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Phenom II X4 N970 and Celeron M 330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and Celeron M 330 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 24 Watt |
Phenom II X4 N970 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 330, on the other hand, has 45.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Phenom II X4 N970 and Intel Celeron M 330. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
