A10-4657M vs Phenom II X4 N970
Aggregate performance score
A10-4657M outperforms Phenom II X4 N970 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2730 | 2688 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 4x AMD Phenom II | AMD A-Series |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 16 December 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 April 2013 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 N970 and A10-4657M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 246 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1303 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 N970 and A10-4657M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 MB | 4 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and A10-4657M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 7660G (497 - 686 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.93 | 1.00 |
| Recency | 16 December 2010 | 1 April 2013 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 4 Watt |
Phenom II X4 N970 has 100% lower power consumption.
A10-4657M, on the other hand, has a 7.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Phenom II X4 N970 and AMD A10-4657M.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
