Ryzen 5 7600 vs Phenom II X4 N950

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 N950
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.56
Ryzen 5 7600
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
17.06
+994%

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Phenom II X4 N950 by a whopping 994% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 N950 and Ryzen 5 7600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2118379
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.02
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series4x AMD Phenom IIno data
Power efficiency4.2024.71
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date4 October 2010 (14 years ago)14 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 N950 and Ryzen 5 7600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data71 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno dataCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 N950 and Ryzen 5 7600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1AM5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 N950 and Ryzen 5 7600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 N950 and Ryzen 5 7600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 N950 and Ryzen 5 7600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5200

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 N950 and Ryzen 5 7600.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 N950 1.56
Ryzen 5 7600 17.06
+994%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 N950 2485
Ryzen 5 7600 27100
+991%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom II X4 N950 275
Ryzen 5 7600 2747
+899%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom II X4 N950 986
Ryzen 5 7600 12225
+1140%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Phenom II X4 N950 1816
Ryzen 5 7600 8122
+347%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Phenom II X4 N950 6554
Ryzen 5 7600 46166
+604%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Phenom II X4 N950 2974
Ryzen 5 7600 15993
+438%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Phenom II X4 N950 17.8
Ryzen 5 7600 3.06
+482%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.56 17.06
Recency 4 October 2010 14 January 2023
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Phenom II X4 N950 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 7600, on the other hand, has a 993.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 N950 in performance tests.

Be aware that Phenom II X4 N950 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 7600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 N950 and Ryzen 5 7600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 N950
Phenom II X4 N950
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
Ryzen 5 7600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 28 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 N950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1260 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 N950 or Ryzen 5 7600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.