Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 vs Phenom II X4 N930
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2664 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 4x AMD Phenom II | Transmeta Crusoe |
| Power efficiency | 1.07 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Transmeta |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Crusoe (2001) |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (15 years ago) | 1 June 2001 (24 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 N930 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | 266 MHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 55 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 36.8 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 N930 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | CBGA-474 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 N930 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3dNow!, SSE (2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Vurtualization, HyperTransport 3.0 | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 N930 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 May 2010 | 1 June 2001 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 7 Watt |
Phenom II X4 N930 has an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.
Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Phenom II X4 N930 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
