A8-3500M vs Phenom II X4 960T BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 960T BE and A8-3500M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2561 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD A-Series |
Power efficiency | no data | 2.38 |
Architecture codename | Zosma (2010−2011) | Llano (2011−2012) |
Release date | 1 June 2010 (14 years ago) | 14 June 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 960T BE and A8-3500M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 346 mm2 | 228 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 904 million | 1,178 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 960T BE and A8-3500M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | AM3 | FS1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and A8-3500M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620G |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and A8-3500M are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and A8-3500M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 6620G (444 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and A8-3500M.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 June 2010 | 14 June 2011 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
A8-3500M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 960T BE and A8-3500M. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X4 960T BE is a desktop processor while A8-3500M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 960T BE and A8-3500M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.