EPYC 4484PX vs Phenom II X4 945 (95W)
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 199 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 50.82 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 25.61 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Deneb (2009−2011) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 22 July 2009 (16 years ago) | 21 May 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $599 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 945 (95W) and EPYC 4484PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 258 mm2 | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 47 °C |
| Number of transistors | 758 million | 17,840 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 945 (95W) and EPYC 4484PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 945 (95W) and EPYC 4484PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 945 (95W) and EPYC 4484PX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 945 (95W) and EPYC 4484PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 945 (95W) and EPYC 4484PX.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 28 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 22 July 2009 | 21 May 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 120 Watt |
Phenom II X4 945 (95W) has 26.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 4484PX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W) and AMD EPYC 4484PX. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X4 945 (95W) is a desktop processor while EPYC 4484PX is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
