FX PRO-8800P vs Phenom II X4 920
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2463 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.49 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 0.42 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Deneb (2009−2011) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 (16 years ago) | 2 June 2015 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $90 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 920 and FX PRO-8800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 320 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 258 mm2 | 250 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 758 million | 3,100 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 920 and FX PRO-8800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 920 and FX PRO-8800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 920 and FX PRO-8800P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 920 and FX PRO-8800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Radeon R7 8CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 920 and FX PRO-8800P.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 January 2009 | 2 June 2015 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 15 Watt |
FX PRO-8800P has an age advantage of 6 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Phenom II X4 920 and AMD FX PRO-8800P. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X4 920 is a desktop processor while FX PRO-8800P is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
