Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Phenom II X4 820

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 820
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.36
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
16.11
+1085%

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms Phenom II X4 820 by a whopping 1085% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 820 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2253439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.10no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency1.3152.46
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 820 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size258 mm2no data
Number of transistors758 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 820 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3FP8
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 820 1.36
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 16.11
+1085%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 820 2081
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 24659
+1085%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.36 16.11
Recency 1 September 2009 1 October 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 28 Watt

Phenom II X4 820 has -75% more threads.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has a 1084.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 100% more physical cores, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 239.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 820 in performance tests.

Note that Phenom II X4 820 is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 820 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 820
Phenom II X4 820
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 58 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 820 or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.