Ryzen 3 3350U vs Phenom II X4 810

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 810
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.24
Ryzen 3 3350U
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.66
+195%

Ryzen 3 3350U outperforms Phenom II X4 810 by a whopping 195% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 810 and Ryzen 3 3350U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23161500
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataPicasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Power efficiency1.2423.09
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date9 February 2009 (15 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$116no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 810 and Ryzen 3 3350U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm12 nm
Die size258 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors758 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 810 and Ryzen 3 3350U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 810 and Ryzen 3 3350U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 810 and Ryzen 3 3350U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 810 and Ryzen 3 3350U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 810 and Ryzen 3 3350U.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 810 1.24
Ryzen 3 3350U 3.66
+195%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 810 1971
Ryzen 3 3350U 5813
+195%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 3.66
Recency 9 February 2009 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 3350U has a 195.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3350U is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 810 in performance tests.

Note that Phenom II X4 810 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 3350U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 810 and Ryzen 3 3350U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 810
Phenom II X4 810
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U
Ryzen 3 3350U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 65 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 40 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3350U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 810 or Ryzen 3 3350U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.