Athlon 64 X2 3600+ vs Phenom II X4 810

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 810
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.24
+210%
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
2005
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.40

Phenom II X4 810 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 3600+ by a whopping 210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 810 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23143008
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.240.43
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)Manchester (2005−2006)
Release date9 February 2009 (15 years ago)31 May 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$116no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 810 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size258 mm2156 mm2
Number of transistors758 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 810 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3939
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt89 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 810 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 810 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 810 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 810 1.24
+210%
Athlon 64 X2 3600+ 0.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 810 1971
+211%
Athlon 64 X2 3600+ 633

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 0.40
Recency 9 February 2009 31 May 2005
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 89 Watt

Phenom II X4 810 has a 210% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 X2 3600+, on the other hand, has 6.7% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X4 810 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 810 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 810
Phenom II X4 810
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+
Athlon 64 X2 3600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 65 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 80 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 810 or Athlon 64 X2 3600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.