A10-4655M vs Phenom II X4 810

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 810
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.24
+19.2%
A10-4655M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.04

Phenom II X4 810 outperforms A10-4655M by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 810 and A10-4655M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23142443
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.233.93
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date9 February 2009 (15 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$116no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 810 and A10-4655M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size258 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistors758 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 810 and A10-4655M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FP2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 810 and A10-4655M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 810 and A10-4655M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 810 and A10-4655M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3unknown Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon HD 7620G (360 - 497 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 810 and A10-4655M.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 810 1.24
+19.2%
A10-4655M 1.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 810 1971
+18.9%
A10-4655M 1658

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom II X4 810 295
+4.6%
A10-4655M 282

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom II X4 810 891
+54.2%
A10-4655M 578

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 1.04
Recency 9 February 2009 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 25 Watt

Phenom II X4 810 has a 19.2% higher aggregate performance score.

A10-4655M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 280% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X4 810 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-4655M in performance tests.

Note that Phenom II X4 810 is a desktop processor while A10-4655M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 810 and A10-4655M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 810
Phenom II X4 810
AMD A10-4655M
A10-4655M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 65 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 64 votes

Rate A10-4655M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 810 or A10-4655M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.