Atom Z510 vs Phenom II X3 P820
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X3 P820 outperforms Atom Z510 by a whopping 445% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2974 | 3578 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 3x AMD Phenom II | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 1.01 | 2.32 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Silverthorne (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (15 years ago) | 2 April 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $20 |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X3 P820 and Atom Z510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | 400 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 11 |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 56 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 24.18 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 47 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.75-1.1V |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X3 P820 and Atom Z510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | S1 | PBGA441 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 2 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X3 P820 and Atom Z510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Virtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a) | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Phenom II X3 P820 and Atom Z510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 P820 and Atom Z510 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 P820 and Atom Z510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.60 | 0.11 |
| Recency | 12 May 2010 | 2 April 2008 |
| Physical cores | 3 | 1 |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 2 Watt |
Phenom II X3 P820 has a 445.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Atom Z510, on the other hand, has 1150% lower power consumption.
The AMD Phenom II X3 P820 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z510 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
