Pro A6-8500B vs Phenom II X3 N830

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X3 N830
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 35 Watt
0.63
Pro A6-8500B
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.91
+44.4%

Pro A6-8500B outperforms Phenom II X3 N830 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30342785
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series3x AMD Phenom IIAMD Carrizo
Power efficiency0.762.56
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date12 May 2010 (15 years ago)3 June 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X3 N830 and Pro A6-8500B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads34
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L2 cache1.5 MB1024 KB
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X3 N830 and Pro A6-8500B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1FP4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X3 N830 and Pro A6-8500B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-VHSA 1.0
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 N830 and Pro A6-8500B are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 N830 and Pro A6-8500B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3/DDR3L-1600
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data256
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X3 N830 and Pro A6-8500B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Phenom II X3 N830 and Pro A6-8500B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X3 N830 and Pro A6-8500B.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Phenom II X3 N830 0.63
Pro A6-8500B 0.91
+44.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Phenom II X3 N830 1107
Pro A6-8500B 1592
+43.8%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.63 0.91
Recency 12 May 2010 3 June 2015
Physical cores 3 2
Threads 3 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Phenom II X3 N830 has 50% more physical cores.

Pro A6-8500B, on the other hand, has a 44.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 33.3% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Pro A6-8500B is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Phenom II X3 N830 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X3 N830
Phenom II X3 N830
AMD Pro A6-8500B
Pro A6-8500B

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 41 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 N830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 6 votes

Rate Pro A6-8500B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Phenom II X3 N830 and Pro A6-8500B, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.