Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Phenom II X2 X620 BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X2 X620 BE and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | 2x AMD Phenom II | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
Release date | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 February 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X2 X620 BE and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus rate | 3600 MHz | 800 MHz |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X2 X620 BE and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | S1 | Socket P 478 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Security technologies
Phenom II X2 X620 BE and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 12 May 2010 | 1 February 2010 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Phenom II X2 X620 BE has an age advantage of 3 months.
Celeron Dual-Core T3300, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X2 X620 BE and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X2 X620 BE and Celeron Dual-Core T3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.