Core 2 Duo E6400 vs Phenom II X2 550 BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X2 550 BE and Core 2 Duo E6400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2888 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.71 |
| Architecture codename | Callisto (2009−2010) | Conroe (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 1 June 2009 (15 years ago) | July 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X2 550 BE and Core 2 Duo E6400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 258 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | 758 million | 291 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X2 550 BE and Core 2 Duo E6400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | LGA775,PLGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X2 550 BE and Core 2 Duo E6400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Phenom II X2 550 BE and Core 2 Duo E6400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X2 550 BE and Core 2 Duo E6400 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X2 550 BE and Core 2 Duo E6400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X2 550 BE and Core 2 Duo E6400.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 65 Watt |
Phenom II X2 550 BE has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Core 2 Duo E6400, on the other hand, has 23.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X2 550 BE and Core 2 Duo E6400. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X2 550 BE and Core 2 Duo E6400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
