Athlon II P320 vs Pentium T4400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium T4400
2009
35 Watt
0.49
+11.4%
Athlon II P320
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.44

Pentium T4400 outperforms Athlon II P320 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium T4400 and Athlon II P320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29032959
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon II
Power efficiency1.321.67
Architecture codenameno dataChamplain (2010−2011)
Release date1 October 2009 (15 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium T4400 and Athlon II P320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Bus rateno data3200 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium T4400 and Athlon II P320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478S1g4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium T4400 and Athlon II P320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVM
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Pentium T4400 and Athlon II P320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium T4400 and Athlon II P320 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium T4400 0.49
+11.4%
Athlon II P320 0.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium T4400 780
+12.2%
Athlon II P320 695

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium T4400 251
+44.3%
Athlon II P320 174

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium T4400 402
+25.6%
Athlon II P320 320

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.49 0.44
Recency 1 October 2009 12 May 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Pentium T4400 has a 11.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon II P320, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 40% lower power consumption.

The Pentium T4400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II P320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium T4400 and Athlon II P320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium T4400
Pentium T4400
AMD Athlon II P320
Athlon II P320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 29 votes

Rate Pentium T4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 76 votes

Rate Athlon II P320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium T4400 or Athlon II P320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.