Celeron N2805 vs Pentium T3400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium T3400
2008
35 Watt
0.41
+95.2%
Celeron N2805
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.21

Pentium T3400 outperforms Celeron N2805 by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29933217
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.144.97
Architecture codenameno dataBay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)11 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.16 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speedno data1.46 GHz
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C80 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.075V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt4.3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching-no data
Smart Connectno data+
FSB parity-no data
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium T3400 0.41
+95.2%
Celeron N2805 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium T3400 663
+97.9%
Celeron N2805 335

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.41 0.21
Recency 1 October 2008 11 September 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 4 Watt

Pentium T3400 has a 95.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N2805, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.

The Pentium T3400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2805 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium T3400
Pentium T3400
Intel Celeron N2805
Celeron N2805

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 15 votes

Rate Pentium T3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 101 vote

Rate Celeron N2805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium T3400 or Celeron N2805, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.