Celeron N2805 vs Pentium T3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameno dataBay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 October 2008 (15 years ago)11 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107
Current price$169 $130 (1.2x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.16 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speedno data1.46 GHz
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C80 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1.075V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt4.3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching-no data
Smart Connectno data+
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Identity Protectionno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium T3400 653
+94.9%
Celeron N2805 335

Pentium T3400 outperforms Celeron N2805 by 95% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 11 September 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 4 Watt

We couldn't decide between Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium T3400 and Celeron N2805, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium T3400
Pentium T3400
Intel Celeron N2805
Celeron N2805

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate Pentium T3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 93 votes

Rate Celeron N2805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium T3400 or Celeron N2805, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.