Atom Z3735G vs Pentium Silver J5005
Primary details
Comparing Pentium Silver J5005 and Atom Z3735G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1889 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.85 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Intel Pentium Silver | no data |
Architecture codename | Goldmont Plus (2017) | Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) |
Release date | 11 December 2017 (6 years ago) | 9 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $161 | $17 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pentium Silver J5005 and Atom Z3735G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
Multiplier | 15 | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 56K (per core) |
L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 2 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | 93 mm2 | 112 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 deg C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Silver J5005 and Atom Z3735G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1090 | UTFCBGA592 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 2 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Silver J5005 and Atom Z3735G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Pentium Silver J5005 and Atom Z3735G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | - |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Silver J5005 and Atom Z3735G are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Silver J5005 and Atom Z3735G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | upto-2400 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 5.3 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series |
Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | 646 MHz |
Execution Units | 18 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium Silver J5005 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium Silver J5005 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Pentium Silver J5005 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Silver J5005 and Atom Z3735G.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 11 December 2017 | 9 April 2014 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 2 Watt |
Pentium Silver J5005 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z3735G, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium Silver J5005 and Atom Z3735G. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium Silver J5005 is a desktop processor while Atom Z3735G is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Silver J5005 and Atom Z3735G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.