Ultra 9 285K vs Pentium Silver A1030
Primary details
Comparing Pentium Silver A1030 and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 54 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 74.24 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | no data | 32.54 |
Architecture codename | no data | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
Release date | 1 July 2020 (4 years ago) | 24 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $589 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pentium Silver A1030 and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
Performance-cores | no data | 8 |
Efficient-cores | no data | 16 |
Threads | 2 | 24 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 250 MHz |
L1 cache | no data | 112 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 3 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 36 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
Die size | no data | 243 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 deg C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 17,800 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Silver A1030 and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1090 | FCLGA1851 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Silver A1030 and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | - | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | + | + |
Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
SIPP | - | + |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | + |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Supported AI Software Frameworks | - | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN |
Security technologies
Pentium Silver A1030 and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | + | + |
MPX | + | - |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | + |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Silver A1030 and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Silver A1030 and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | upto-2400 | DDR5-6400 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 192 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® Graphics |
Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | + |
Graphics max frequency | 700 GHz | 2 GHz |
Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium Silver A1030 and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | 4 |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium Silver A1030 and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4K @ 60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 8K @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Pentium Silver A1030 and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Silver A1030 and Core Ultra 9 285K.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 6 | 20 |
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 July 2020 | 24 October 2024 |
Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
Threads | 2 | 24 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 125 Watt |
Pentium Silver A1030 has 733.3% lower power consumption.
Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Pentium Silver A1030 and Core Ultra 9 285K. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Pentium Silver A1030 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Silver A1030 and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.