Apple M1 vs Pentium P6300

Aggregate performance score

Pentium P6300
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53

Apple M1 outperforms Pentium P6300 by a whopping 875% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium P6300 and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28581194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency1.43no data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)no data
Release date9 January 2011 (13 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium P6300 and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.27 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache64K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors384 million16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium P6300 and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPGA988no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium P6300 and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Pentium P6300 and Apple M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium P6300 and Apple M1 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium P6300 and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsApple M1 8-Core GPU
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium P6300 and Apple M1 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium P6300 and Apple M1.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium P6300 0.53
Apple M1 5.17
+875%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium P6300 834
Apple M1 8207
+884%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 5.17
Recency 9 January 2011 10 November 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 has a 875.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium P6300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium P6300 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium P6300
Pentium P6300
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 8 votes

Rate Pentium P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2237 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium P6300 or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.