Atom C3338 vs Pentium N4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium N4200
2016, $161
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.26
+110%

Pentium N4200 outperforms Atom C3338 by a whopping 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26633198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.080.06
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Atom
Power efficiency8.702.76
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date1 September 2016 (10 years ago)22 February 2017 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$27

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Pentium N4200 has 33% better value for money than Atom C3338.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Pentium N4200 and Atom C3338: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplierno data15
L1 cacheno data112 KB
L2 cache2 MB4 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C89 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium N4200 and Atom C3338 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1296FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N4200 and Atom C3338. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Pentium N4200 and Atom C3338 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Boot++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXno data-
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N4200 and Atom C3338 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N4200 and Atom C3338. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR3, DDR4DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 505no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units18no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N4200 and Atom C3338 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium N4200 and Atom C3338 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N4200 and Atom C3338.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanes610
USB revision2.0/3.03
Total number of SATA ports210
Number of USB ports88
Integrated LAN-4x2.5/1 GBE
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium N4200 1.26
+110%
Atom C3338 0.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Pentium N4200 2160
+110%
Samples: 843
Atom C3338 1028
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.26 0.60
Recency 1 September 2016 22 February 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 8 Watt

Pentium N4200 has a 110% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 33% lower power consumption.

Atom C3338, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months.

The Intel Pentium N4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom C3338 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium N4200 is a notebook processor while Atom C3338 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 816 votes

Rate Pentium N4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3338 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium N4200 and Atom C3338, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.