Celeron J1750 vs Pentium N3710

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium N3710
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.88
+138%
Celeron J1750
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.37

Pentium N3710 outperforms Celeron J1750 by a whopping 138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium N3710 and Celeron J1750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25603032
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Power efficiency13.813.48
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date1 April 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$72

Detailed specifications

Pentium N3710 and Celeron J1750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed2.56 GHz2.41 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium N3710 and Celeron J1750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3710 and Celeron J1750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
PAEno data36 Bit
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
FDIno data-
HD Audio+no data
RST--

Security technologies

Pentium N3710 and Celeron J1750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3710 and Celeron J1750 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3710 and Celeron J1750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) (400 - 700 MHz)Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency700 MHz750 MHz
Execution Units16no data
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N3710 and Celeron J1750 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium N3710 and Celeron J1750 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3710 and Celeron J1750.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium N3710 0.88
+138%
Celeron J1750 0.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium N3710 1390
+134%
Celeron J1750 595

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.88 0.37
Integrated graphics card 0.73 0.77
Recency 1 April 2016 1 September 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 10 Watt

Pentium N3710 has a 137.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

Celeron J1750, on the other hand, has 5.5% faster integrated GPU.

The Pentium N3710 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1750 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N3710 and Celeron J1750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium N3710
Pentium N3710
Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 645 votes

Rate Pentium N3710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium N3710 or Celeron J1750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.