Pentium 967 vs Pentium N3510
Primary details
Comparing Pentium N3510 and Pentium 967 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2758 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Pentium | Intel Pentium |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 1 December 2013 (10 years ago) | 3 October 2011 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $161 | $134 |
Detailed specifications
Pentium N3510 and Pentium 967 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 224 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 504 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium N3510 and Pentium 967 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | BGA1023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3510 and Pentium 967. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| FMA | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
Security technologies
Pentium N3510 and Pentium 967 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3510 and Pentium 967. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3510 and Pentium 967.
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 65%
Pentium N3510 outperforms Pentium 967 by 37% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 40%
Pentium 967 outperforms Pentium N3510 by 42% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 40%
Pentium N3510 outperforms Pentium 967 by 32% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Pentium 967 outperforms Pentium N3510 by 58% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Pentium N3510 outperforms Pentium 967 by 21% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Pentium N3510 outperforms Pentium 967 by 52% in 3DMark06 CPU.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Pentium 967 outperforms Pentium N3510 by 95% in wPrime 32.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
Pentium N3510 outperforms Pentium 967 by 56% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 December 2013 | 3 October 2011 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 17 Watt |
Pentium N3510 has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 142.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium N3510 and Pentium 967. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N3510 and Pentium 967, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
