Core 2 Solo SL3400 vs Pentium M ULV 900

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M ULV 900 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium Mno data
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)no data
Release dateno data1 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M ULV 900 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speedno data1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed0.9 GHzno data
Bus rate400 MHz1066 MHz
L3 cacheno data3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography130 nm45 nm
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.15V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M ULV 900 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataBGA956
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M ULV 900 and Core 2 Solo SL3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Pentium M ULV 900 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M ULV 900 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 17 Watt

Pentium M ULV 900 has 142.9% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Solo SL3400, on the other hand, has a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium M ULV 900 and Core 2 Solo SL3400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M ULV 900 and Core 2 Solo SL3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M ULV 900
Pentium M ULV 900
Intel Core 2 Solo SL3400
Core 2 Solo SL3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Pentium M ULV 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Solo SL3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M ULV 900 or Core 2 Solo SL3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.