E2-3200 vs Pentium M 780

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 780
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.24
E2-3200
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.61
+154%

E2-3200 outperforms Pentium M 780 by a whopping 154% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 780 and E2-3200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31802797
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesPentium Mno data
Power efficiency0.840.88
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date25 July 2005 (19 years ago)7 September 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 780 and E2-3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed2.26 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache32 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die size87 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors144 million1,178 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.26V-1.404Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 780 and E2-3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479FM1
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 780 and E2-3200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 780 and E2-3200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 780 and E2-3200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 780 and E2-3200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Radeon HD 6370D

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.24 0.61
Recency 25 July 2005 7 September 2011
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 65 Watt

Pentium M 780 has 140.7% lower power consumption.

E2-3200, on the other hand, has a 154.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

The E2-3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 780 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium M 780 is a notebook processor while E2-3200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 780 and E2-3200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 780
Pentium M 780
AMD E2-3200
E2-3200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 23 votes

Rate Pentium M 780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 23 votes

Rate E2-3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 780 or E2-3200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.