Celeron 847 vs Pentium M 770

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 770 and Celeron 847 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date19 January 2005 (19 years ago)19 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$134

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 770 and Celeron 847 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed2.13 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.01 GHz1.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate533 MHz4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache32 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die size87 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors144 million504 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.26V-1.372Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 770 and Celeron 847 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 770 and Celeron 847. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bitno data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 770 and Celeron 847 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 770 and Celeron 847 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 770 and Celeron 847. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Graphics max frequencyno data800 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium M 770 and Celeron 847 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 770 and Celeron 847.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium M 770 740
Celeron 847 993
+34.1%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 January 2005 19 June 2011
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron 847 has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 58.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium M 770 and Celeron 847. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 770 and Celeron 847, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 770
Pentium M 770
Intel Celeron 847
Celeron 847

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 13 votes

Rate Pentium M 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 356 votes

Rate Celeron 847 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 770 or Celeron 847, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.