Processor N200 vs Pentium M 735

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

Comparing Pentium M 735 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1995
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MIntel Alder Lake-N
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Alder Lake-N
Release dateMay 2004 (20 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$51 no data

Detailed Specifications

Pentium M 735 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads144 x 3.7  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed1.7 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support400 MHzno data
L1 cache32 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm10 nm
Die size84 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors140 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.988V-1.34Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 735 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 735 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Pentium M 735 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 735 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 735 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR54800 MHz Single-channel
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 735 and Processor N200.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Pentium M 735 1459
Processor N200 3937
+170%

Processor N200 outperforms Pentium M 735 by 170% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium M 735 698
Processor N200 3902
+459%

Processor N200 outperforms Pentium M 735 by 459% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & Cons Summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 6 Watt

We couldn't decide between Pentium M 735 and Processor N200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 735 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 735
Pentium M 735
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 12 votes

Rate Pentium M 735 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 102 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 735 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.