EPYC 7443P vs Pentium M 735

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 735
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.18
EPYC 7443P
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
35.86
+19822%

EPYC 7443P outperforms Pentium M 735 by a whopping 19822% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7443P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3263103
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data24.20
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesPentium MAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.8116.97
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date10 May 2004 (20 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,337

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7443P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads148
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.85 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
Multiplierno data28.5
L1 cache32 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm+
Die size87 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors144 million16,600 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.988V-1.34Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7443P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478SP3
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7443P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7443P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7443P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7443P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7443P.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.18 35.86
Recency 10 May 2004 15 March 2021
Physical cores 1 24
Threads 1 48
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 200 Watt

Pentium M 735 has 2757.1% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7443P, on the other hand, has a 19822.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7443P is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 735 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium M 735 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7443P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7443P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 735
Pentium M 735
AMD EPYC 7443P
EPYC 7443P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 12 votes

Rate Pentium M 735 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7443P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 735 or EPYC 7443P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.