EPYC 9454P vs Pentium M 713
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 33 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 10.22 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Pentium M | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.95 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Banias (2003) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | no data | 10 November 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,598 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 713 and EPYC 9454P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.75 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 27.5 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | no data | 8x 72 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 52,560 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 713 and EPYC 9454P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 290 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 713 and EPYC 9454P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 713 and EPYC 9454P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 713 and EPYC 9454P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 460.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 713 and EPYC 9454P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 48 |
| Threads | 1 | 96 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 290 Watt |
Pentium M 713 has 5700% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9454P, on the other hand, has 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Pentium M 713 and AMD EPYC 9454P. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Pentium M 713 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9454P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
