Pentium D 960 vs Pentium G870

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G870
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.01
+90.6%

Pentium G870 outperforms Pentium D 960 by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G870 and Pentium D 960 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24742867
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.30no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.420.37
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Presler (2005−2007)
Release date3 June 2012 (12 years ago)23 April 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$523

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Pentium G870 and Pentium D 960 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

Pentium G870 and Pentium D 960 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)16 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per die)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size131 mm22x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors504 million376 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.2V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G870 and Pentium D 960 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155LGA775,PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G870 and Pentium D 960. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Pentium G870 and Pentium D 960 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G870 and Pentium D 960 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G870 and Pentium D 960. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G870 and Pentium D 960 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G870 and Pentium D 960.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G870 1.01
+90.6%
Pentium D 960 0.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G870 1546
+91.6%
Pentium D 960 807

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.01 0.53
Recency 3 June 2012 23 April 2006
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 130 Watt

Pentium G870 has a 90.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Pentium G870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium D 960 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G870 and Pentium D 960, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G870
Pentium G870
Intel Pentium D 960
Pentium D 960

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 50 votes

Rate Pentium G870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 23 votes

Rate Pentium D 960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G870 or Pentium D 960, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.