Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs Pentium G6960

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G6960
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.90
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 120 Watt
25.27
+2708%

Ryzen 7 9800X3D outperforms Pentium G6960 by a whopping 2708% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G6960 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2546203
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.59
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.1619.82
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date9 January 2011 (13 years ago)7 November 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G6960 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed2.93 GHz4.7 GHz
Boost clock speed0.93 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache3072 KB (shared)96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size81 mm270.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 million8,315 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G6960 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156AM5
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G6960 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Pentium G6960 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G6960 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G6960 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HDAMD Radeon Graphics

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G6960 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G6960 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1624

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G6960 0.90
Ryzen 7 9800X3D 25.27
+2708%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G6960 1433
Ryzen 7 9800X3D 40142
+2701%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.90 25.27
Recency 9 January 2011 7 November 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 120 Watt

Pentium G6960 has 64.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 9800X3D, on the other hand, has a 2707.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G6960 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G6960 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G6960
Pentium G6960
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 5 votes

Rate Pentium G6960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 262 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 9800X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G6960 or Ryzen 7 9800X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.