A8-7680 vs Pentium G4600T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G4600T
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.93
A8-7680
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
2.24
+16.1%

A8-7680 outperforms Pentium G4600T by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G4600T and A8-7680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19661835
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3015.78
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel PentiumAMD A8
Power efficiency5.224.71
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Excavator (2017−2018)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)26 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$56

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A8-7680 has 5160% better value for money than Pentium G4600T.

Detailed specifications

Pentium G4600T and A8-7680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3038
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °C74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G4600T and A8-7680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socket1151FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G4600T and A8-7680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G4600T and A8-7680 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G4600T and A8-7680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 630Radeon R7 Series

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G4600T and A8-7680.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G4600T 1.93
A8-7680 2.24
+16.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G4600T 3062
A8-7680 3551
+16%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.93 2.24
Recency 3 January 2017 26 October 2018
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Pentium G4600T has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

A8-7680, on the other hand, has a 16.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores.

The A8-7680 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G4600T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G4600T and A8-7680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G4600T
Pentium G4600T
AMD A8-7680
A8-7680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate Pentium G4600T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 517 votes

Rate A8-7680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G4600T or A8-7680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.