Celeron 1017U vs Pentium G3260

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G3260
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.32
+38.9%
Celeron 1017U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.95

Pentium G3260 outperforms Celeron 1017U by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G3260 and Celeron 1017U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22682516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.365.29
Architecture codenameno dataIvy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 January 2015 (9 years ago)1 July 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium G3260 and Celeron 1017U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.3 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache3 MB2 MB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data94 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G3260 and Celeron 1017U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G3260 and Celeron 1017U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Pentium G3260 and Celeron 1017U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G3260 and Celeron 1017U are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G3260 and Celeron 1017U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G3260 and Celeron 1017U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
VGA+no data
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium G3260 and Celeron 1017U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium G3260 and Celeron 1017U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G3260 and Celeron 1017U.

PCIe versionUp to 3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G3260 1.32
+38.9%
Celeron 1017U 0.95

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G3260 2096
+39%
Celeron 1017U 1508

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium G3260 583
+122%
Celeron 1017U 263

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium G3260 998
+120%
Celeron 1017U 454

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.32 0.95
Recency 1 January 2015 1 July 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 17 Watt

Pentium G3260 has a 38.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Celeron 1017U, on the other hand, has 211.8% lower power consumption.

The Pentium G3260 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1017U in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G3260 is a desktop processor while Celeron 1017U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G3260 and Celeron 1017U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G3260
Pentium G3260
Intel Celeron 1017U
Celeron 1017U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 211 votes

Rate Pentium G3260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 71 vote

Rate Celeron 1017U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G3260 or Celeron 1017U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.