Xeon Gold 6314U vs Pentium G3250

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G3250
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.25
Xeon Gold 6314U
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
30.23
+2318%

Xeon Gold 6314U outperforms Pentium G3250 by a whopping 2318% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G3250 and Xeon Gold 6314U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2295137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.1913.96
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date21 July 2014 (10 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$171no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G3250 and Xeon Gold 6314U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C81 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G3250 and Xeon Gold 6314U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G3250 and Xeon Gold 6314U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Pentium G3250 and Xeon Gold 6314U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G3250 and Xeon Gold 6314U are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G3250 and Xeon Gold 6314U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G3250 and Xeon Gold 6314U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium G3250 and Xeon Gold 6314U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium G3250 and Xeon Gold 6314U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G3250 and Xeon Gold 6314U.

PCIe versionUp to 3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G3250 1.25
Xeon Gold 6314U 30.23
+2318%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G3250 1991
Xeon Gold 6314U 48013
+2312%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.25 30.23
Recency 21 July 2014 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 205 Watt

Pentium G3250 has 286.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6314U, on the other hand, has a 2318.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6314U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G3250 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G3250 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6314U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G3250 and Xeon Gold 6314U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G3250
Pentium G3250
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
Xeon Gold 6314U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 322 votes

Rate Pentium G3250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6314U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G3250 or Xeon Gold 6314U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.