Celeron D 352 vs Pentium G3250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G3250 and Celeron D 352 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2293not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.20no data
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Cedar Mill (2006)
Release date21 July 2014 (10 years ago)May 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$171no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G3250 and Celeron D 352 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)16 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die size177 mm2109 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data69 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million125 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.25V-1.325V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G3250 and Celeron D 352 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt86 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G3250 and Celeron D 352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Pentium G3250 and Celeron D 352 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G3250 and Celeron D 352 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G3250 and Celeron D 352. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G3250 and Celeron D 352 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium G3250 and Celeron D 352 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium G3250 and Celeron D 352 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G3250 and Celeron D 352.

PCIe versionUp to 3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G3250 1988
+626%
Celeron D 352 274

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 86 Watt

Pentium G3250 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 62.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium G3250 and Celeron D 352. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G3250 and Celeron D 352, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G3250
Pentium G3250
Intel Celeron D 352
Celeron D 352

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 321 vote

Rate Pentium G3250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 35 votes

Rate Celeron D 352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G3250 or Celeron D 352, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.