Xeon Platinum 8571N vs Pentium G3240T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G3240T
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.05
Xeon Platinum 8571N
2023
52 cores / 104 threads, 300 Watt
43.05
+4000%

Xeon Platinum 8571N outperforms Pentium G3240T by a whopping 4000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G3240T and Xeon Platinum 8571N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking243654
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.42
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.8413.58
Architecture codenameno dataEmerald Rapids (2023)
Release date1 April 2014 (10 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,839

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G3240T and Xeon Platinum 8571N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)52
Threads2104
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data300 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno dataIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G3240T and Xeon Platinum 8571N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G3240T and Xeon Platinum 8571N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Pentium G3240T and Xeon Platinum 8571N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G3240T and Xeon Platinum 8571N are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G3240T and Xeon Platinum 8571N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G3240T and Xeon Platinum 8571N.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G3240T 1.05
Xeon Platinum 8571N 43.05
+4000%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G3240T 1674
Xeon Platinum 8571N 68385
+3985%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.05 43.05
Recency 1 April 2014 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 52
Threads 2 104
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 300 Watt

Pentium G3240T has 757.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8571N, on the other hand, has a 4000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 2500% more physical cores and 5100% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G3240T in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G3240T is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8571N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G3240T and Xeon Platinum 8571N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G3240T
Pentium G3240T
Intel Xeon Platinum 8571N
Xeon Platinum 8571N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 6 votes

Rate Pentium G3240T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8571N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G3240T or Xeon Platinum 8571N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.