i3-7320T vs Pentium G3220
Primary details
Comparing Pentium G3220 and Core i3-7320T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2359 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.13 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i3 |
| Power efficiency | 2.09 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 1 September 2013 (11 years ago) | 17 July 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $71 | $147 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pentium G3220 and Core i3-7320T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 36 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 177 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 65 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium G3220 and Core i3-7320T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 1150 | 1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G3220 and Core i3-7320T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G3220 and Core i3-7320T are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G3220 and Core i3-7320T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD (Haswell) | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G3220 and Core i3-7320T.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2013 | 17 July 2017 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 35 Watt |
i3-7320T has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 54.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium G3220 and Core i3-7320T. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G3220 and Core i3-7320T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
