EPYC 8024P vs Pentium G2020
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 8024P outperforms Pentium G2020 by a whopping 1102% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2738 | 791 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.04 | 22.62 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.74 | 5.47 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 21 January 2013 (13 years ago) | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $60 | $409 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 8024P has 56450% better value for money than Pentium G2020.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Pentium G2020 and EPYC 8024P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 94 mm2 | 73 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | 75 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 8,875 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium G2020 and EPYC 8024P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1155 | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 90 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G2020 and EPYC 8024P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| My WiFi | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Pentium G2020 and EPYC 8024P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G2020 and EPYC 8024P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G2020 and EPYC 8024P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors | N/A |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G2020 and EPYC 8024P integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G2020 and EPYC 8024P.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 96 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.97 | 11.66 |
| Recency | 21 January 2013 | 18 September 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 90 Watt |
Pentium G2020 has 63.6% lower power consumption.
EPYC 8024P, on the other hand, has a 1102.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 8024P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium G2020 in performance tests.
Note that Pentium G2020 is a desktop processor while EPYC 8024P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
