Core 2 Duo E4500 vs Pentium E6500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium E6500
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.74
+60.9%
Core 2 Duo E4500
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.46

Pentium E6500 outperforms Core 2 Duo E4500 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium E6500 and Core 2 Duo E4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26822936
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.74no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.080.67
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Allendale (2006−2009)
Release date9 August 2009 (15 years ago)July 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$50no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium E6500 and Core 2 Duo E4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.93 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.93 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size82 mm2111 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C73 °C
Number of transistors228 million167 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V – 1.3625V0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E6500 and Core 2 Duo E4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E6500 and Core 2 Duo E4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Pentium E6500 and Core 2 Duo E4500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E6500 and Core 2 Duo E4500 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E6500 and Core 2 Duo E4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E6500 and Core 2 Duo E4500.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium E6500 0.74
+60.9%
Core 2 Duo E4500 0.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium E6500 1172
+59.7%
Core 2 Duo E4500 734

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium E6500 339
+47.4%
Core 2 Duo E4500 230

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium E6500 552
+46.8%
Core 2 Duo E4500 376

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 0.46
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Pentium E6500 has a 60.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Pentium E6500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E4500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E6500 and Core 2 Duo E4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E6500
Pentium E6500
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
Core 2 Duo E4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 264 votes

Rate Pentium E6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 341 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo E4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium E6500 or Core 2 Duo E4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.