EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Pentium E5300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium E5300
2008, $64
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.53
EPYC Embedded 8224P
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 160 Watt
27.91
+5166%

EPYC Embedded 8224P outperforms Pentium E5300 by a whopping 5166% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3141223
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.04no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.347.37
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Siena (2023−2024)
Release dateNovember 2008 (17 years ago)18 September 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Pentium E5300 and EPYC Embedded 8224P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.55 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm
Die size82 mm22x 73 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors228 million17,750 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E5300 and EPYC Embedded 8224P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775SP6
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt160 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E5300 and EPYC Embedded 8224P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Pentium E5300 and EPYC Embedded 8224P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E5300 and EPYC Embedded 8224P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E5300 and EPYC Embedded 8224P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E5300 and EPYC Embedded 8224P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium E5300 0.53
EPYC Embedded 8224P 27.91
+5166%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Pentium E5300 934
Samples: 1567
EPYC Embedded 8224P 48869
+5132%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 27.91
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 160 Watt

Pentium E5300 has 146.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 8224P, on the other hand, has a 5166% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium E5300 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium E5300 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 8224P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E5300
Pentium E5300
AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P
EPYC Embedded 8224P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 641 votes

Rate Pentium E5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8224P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium E5300 and EPYC Embedded 8224P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.