Celeron E3300 vs Pentium E5200

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Pentium E5200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads
0.60
+17.6%
Celeron E3300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads
0.51

Pentium E5200 outperforms Celeron E3300 by 18% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium E5200 and Celeron E3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26652736
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.130.83
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release dateAugust 2008 (15 years ago)August 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99$70
Current price$40 (0.4x MSRP)$46 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Pentium E5200 has 36% better value for money than Celeron E3300.

Detailed specifications

Pentium E5200 and Celeron E3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size82 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C74 °C
Number of transistors228 million228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E5200 and Celeron E3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E5200 and Celeron E3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI--
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Pentium E5200 and Celeron E3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E5200 and Celeron E3300 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E5200 and Celeron E3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium E5200 0.60
+17.6%
Celeron E3300 0.51

Pentium E5200 outperforms Celeron E3300 by 18% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium E5200 927
+16.6%
Celeron E3300 795

Pentium E5200 outperforms Celeron E3300 by 17% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium E5200 284
+17.4%
Celeron E3300 242

Pentium E5200 outperforms Celeron E3300 by 17% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium E5200 453
+10.8%
Celeron E3300 409

Pentium E5200 outperforms Celeron E3300 by 11% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.60 0.51
Cost $99 $70

The Pentium E5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E5200 and Celeron E3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E5200
Pentium E5200
Intel Celeron E3300
Celeron E3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 250 votes

Rate Pentium E5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 163 votes

Rate Celeron E3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium E5200 or Celeron E3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.