Athlon Gold 7220C vs Pentium E2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium E2200 and Athlon Gold 7220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Architecture codenameno dataMendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)
Release date1 October 2007 (16 years ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium E2200 and Athlon Gold 7220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache4 MB
Chip lithography65 nm6 nm
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E2200 and Athlon Gold 7220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E2200 and Athlon Gold 7220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Pentium E2200 and Athlon Gold 7220C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E2200 and Athlon Gold 7220C are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2007 23 May 2023
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon Gold 7220C has an age advantage of 15 years, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium E2200 and Athlon Gold 7220C. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium E2200 is a desktop processor while Athlon Gold 7220C is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E2200 and Athlon Gold 7220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E2200
Pentium E2200
AMD Athlon Gold 7220C
Athlon Gold 7220C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 38 votes

Rate Pentium E2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 7220C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium E2200 or Athlon Gold 7220C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.