Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) vs Pentium Dual T3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3277not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual Coreno data
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Deneb (2009−2011)
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)13 August 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size143 mm2258 mm2
Number of transistors291 Million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478AM3
Power consumption (TDP)1 MB140 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W).

PCIe versionno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 13 August 2009
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 1 Watt 140 Watt

Pentium Dual T3400 has 13900% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 and AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pentium Dual Core T3400 is a notebook processor while Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400
Pentium Dual Core T3400
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W)
Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W)

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 90 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 108 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.