Athlon II X3 450 vs Pentium Dual T3400
Primary details
Comparing Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Athlon II X3 450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2344 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 4.89 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Pentium Dual Core | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.16 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Rana (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 1 October 2008 (16 years ago) | 21 September 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $45 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Athlon II X3 450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 3 (Tri-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 3 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 169 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 300 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Athlon II X3 450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Athlon II X3 450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Athlon II X3 450.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2008 | 21 September 2010 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 3 |
| Threads | 2 | 3 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Pentium Dual T3400 has 171.4% lower power consumption.
Athlon II X3 450, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Athlon II X3 450. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Pentium Dual Core T3400 is a notebook processor while Athlon II X3 450 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Athlon II X3 450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
