Ryzen 9 5950X vs Pentium Dual T3200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium Dual Core T3200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.40
Ryzen 9 5950X
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
28.70
+7075%

Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Pentium Dual Core T3200 by a whopping 7075% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Ryzen 9 5950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3011160
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data27.74
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency1.0825.85
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)5 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Ryzen 9 5950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
Multiplierno data34
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size143 mm2CPU cores: 2x 80.7 sq. mm., I/O: 125 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Ryzen 9 5950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Ryzen 9 5950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Ryzen 9 5950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Ryzen 9 5950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Ryzen 9 5950X.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium Dual T3200 0.40
Ryzen 9 5950X 28.70
+7075%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium Dual T3200 631
Ryzen 9 5950X 45593
+7126%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium Dual T3200 3600
Ryzen 9 5950X 56641
+1473%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.40 28.70
Recency 1 October 2008 5 November 2020
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 105 Watt

Pentium Dual T3200 has 200% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 5950X, on the other hand, has a 7075% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 5950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Dual Core T3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium Dual Core T3200 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 5950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Ryzen 9 5950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200
Pentium Dual Core T3200
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Ryzen 9 5950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 82 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2580 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T3200 or Ryzen 9 5950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.