Celeron M 722 vs Pentium Dual T3200
Primary details
Comparing Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Celeron M 722 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Pentium Dual Core | Intel Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 1 October 2008 (15 years ago) | 1 October 2008 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Celeron M 722 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Celeron M 722 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | VGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 5.5 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 5 Watt |
Pentium Dual T3200 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron M 722, on the other hand, has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 600% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Celeron M 722. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Celeron M 722, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
